|
|
|
Crucial
Words in the Christian Vocabulary: Repentance (4) Isaiah
30:15 Jeremiah
24:7 Mark
1:14-15
Romans 2:4 Some words in the Christian vocabulary have acquired a
“bad press.” As soon as such a
word is mentioned negative associations surround it.
“Repentance” is such a word. For
many people the word is off-putting because of the images that accompany it:
breast-beating, tears, self-accusation, self-rejection. Repentance is commonly
thought to be a matter of fishing around in the hidden depths of spiritual
sludge, dredging up whatever might be there and staring at it unhelpfully.
And to be sure, among some people whose zeal outstripped their wisdom
it’s been thought that the worse we can appear to ourselves (at least) the
more virtuous we are supposed to be. “Repentance”
has a bad press, again, in that it’s frequently linked to an exaggerated
feeling of guilt. We’ve all heard
preaching that attempts to precipitate a crisis of repentance (so-called) by
artificially magnifying guilt. The
fires of guilt are stoked until repentance is seized to extinguish them.
Coincidentally I have noticed that mental health experts tend to be
suspicious of “religion” if not downright hostile to it.
I have long thought too that their anti-religious sentiment appears to be
fed by the distressed people who seek them professionally, the distress of these
people quickened by religiously fanned emotional torment.
If repentance presupposes emotional shipwreck, who needs it? Repentance
is often confused, in the third place, with remorse.
Unquestionably the remorseful person feels dreadful.
Remorse, however, is depression-ridden regret over what one has done or
over the consequences of what one has done.
Remorse, depression-riddled regret, is never the same as repentance (as
we shall shortly see.) It’s
easy to understand that “repentance” is a word our society prefers to
forget. No one is going to be helped
by anything that rubs our nose in our personal garbage pail or artificially
magnifies guilt or soaks us in depression. Nevertheless,
we Christians can never delete the word from our vocabulary.
After all, we know that Jesus Christ comes only to impart wholeness,
healing, helpfulness, and yet he summons people to repentance every day of his
earthly ministry. Not only is the
summons to repent always on our Lord’s lips; it’s always an urgent
summons. “Don’t put it off,”
he insists; “What are you waiting for? Can’t
you see this is what the physician prescribes?
Can’t you see that you need this as you need nothing else?”
The summons to repentance is one of the major building blocks of our
Lord’s ministry. If we pull it
out, his ministry becomes unrecognizable. I: -- Repentance,
at bottom, isn’t garbage-pail picking. It
is a change of mind with an attendant
change in life. Both are needed.
If there’s only a change in our thinking then we are racing our motor
with the gears in neutral: lots of impressive-sounding noise pouring forth (from
under the hood) but no advance. I
remember sitting with a suffering man, an alcoholic still a long way from
contented sobriety, at On
the other hand if there’s a change in behaviour without a profound
transformation of mind and heart then we have merely conformed outwardly to peer
pressure. Inwardly we are no
different. As soon as a changed
environment changes the peer pressure our behaviour will alter again – even as
we remain the same inwardly. This
chameleon-likeness is obviously not the repentance Jesus urges.
He insists on both a change in how we are thinking, how we understand
ourselves before him, and a change in
the course we are pursuing. Foundationally, repentance is a turning
toward God. The Hebrew mind
understands such turning to be a returning
to God, an about-face. When the
Israelite people heard the prophets summon them to repentance they immediately
saw three vivid pictures that the prophets were forever holding up before the
people. [i]
The first is that of an unfaithful wife returning to her husband.
She has violated their marriage covenant.
She has disgraced herself and humiliated her spouse.
She has rendered their marriage the butt of cruel snickering and bad
jokes. If she isn’t publicly
ridiculed, she is privately whispered to be treacherous.
Yet her husband’s love for her, however wounded, remains undiminished
and his patience unexhausted. As she
turns to him she returns to longstanding love. [ii] The
second picture the Hebrew prophets paint is that of idol-worshippers returning
to the worship of the true God. In
the Hebrew language, the word for “the idols” is “the nothings.”
Idols are literally nothing: vacuous, insubstantial.
Yet nothing is never merely nothing.
In some sense nothing is always something.
Nothing, never merely nothing, is always something; paradoxically,
something with terrific power. Think of a vacuum.
By definition a vacuum is nothing and yet is possessed of such power that
it sucks everything around it into it. Think
of a lie. By definition a lie is
nothing. A lie is a statement that corresponds to nothing.
Yet a lie has immense power. Think
of slander. Slander is a statement
that ruins someone’s reputation, ruins her future, ruins her earthly fortunes
when in fact the statement is wholly insubstantial, vacuous, nothing.
But the damage nothing does isn’t nothing; the damage that nothing does
is everything: ruinous. Or
think of a statement that isn’t slanderous but is merely untrue.
If I were to say, in the course of this sermon, that a huge snowstorm was
on the way most people would stop listening to the sermon and begin plotting how
they were going to get home. Some
would get up and leave right now. Others
would move their car from the parking lot to the street so as not to be ploughed
in. All would lament that we
hadn’t worn our winter boots to worship and would make a note to purchase
another pair tomorrow. In other
words all of us would be orienting our lives around the statement that record
snowfall is imminent – when the statement is a lie.
Nothing, our Hebrew foreparents knew, is never merely nothing.
Nothing – vacuity, hollowness – it’s oddly ‘something’ with
destructive power. When
idol-worshippers turn from idols to the true and living God they return
to truth, reality, substance, solidity; in a word they return to blessing so
weighty that nothing can inhibit it or frustrate it or dissipate it. [iii] The
third picture from the Hebrew bible is that of rebel subjects returning to their
rightful ruler. To rebel against
rightful rule, fitting rule, appropriate rule, is always to move from order to
chaos. We must be sure to understand
that groundless rebellion is revolt against legitimate authority, not against
arbitrary authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is no more than a bully’s
coercion, enforced by gun or club. Authority,
on the other hand, is that which ensures our greatest good.
When rebel subjects rebel not against authoritarianism but against proper
authority they plunge themselves into disorder and chaos.
When they return to their rightful ruler they return to trustworthy
wisdom, to that which ensures their blessing, their greatest good. To
repent, then, is to return to longstanding love, to truth, to legitimate
authority. We
can know all of this, at least be aware of it in our head, and yet remain
unaware of specific areas of our lives where (re)turning is needed.
Since we are unaware of what’s needed now no amount of looking in upon
ourselves will tell us what’s needed. We
need someone else to tell us, someone whom we trust, someone from whom we can
hear the truth about ourselves without exploding or denying or
“retaliating.” For
years I assumed that I had privileged access to myself.
In other words, I assumed that not only did I know more about myself than
anyone else knew about me, I necessarily
knew more about myself, knew more about myself in all circumstances without
exception, than anyone else could know about me.
I clung to this illusion and folly for years,
Little by little, amidst much pain and no less public embarrassment, I
came to see that while there are certainly some situations where I know more
about myself than others do, there are many situations where anyone at all has
better insight into me than I have into myself.
There are situations where a five-year old has better insight into me
than I have into myself. Finally I
surrendered my illusion: I don’t have
privileged access to myself. None of
us has. For
this reason we need someone we trust to hold the mirror up to us, someone whose
gentle word we know isn’t an attack upon us; we need some such person to help
us see what we are never going to see by ourselves.
Such a person says to us, “Why do you keep putting your wife down when
in fact she needs affirmation?” “Why
are you so harsh with your children at home but pretend such affection in
public?” Because the mirror has
been held up by someone we trust we aren’t going to “fly off the handle”
and flee into our fort with all guns blazing.
Instead we shall soberly admit what the mirror reflects: we must turn to
face the truth about ourselves and the claim of our Lord upon us, even as the
face of longstanding love shines upon us ceaselessly. II: -- What
moves us to repentance? Why would
anyone gladly make a “u-turn”, eagerly turn around?
One thing above everything else moves us to repent: the mercy and
kindness of God. Paul writes to the
Christians in John
the Baptist spoke much of repentance. His
motive for it was fear, sheer fear. “The
axe is laid to the root of the tree. The
chaff is being burned in the fire. Repentance is the only route to survival.”
It’s the big threat. Yet
we falsify Jesus if we pretend that he never threatened.
He did. And besides, didn’t
Jesus say he endorsed cousin John’s ministry without reservation?
Yet Jesus differs from John the Baptist in one important regard: for
Jesus the decisive motive for repentance is the overwhelming, all-encompassing,
incomprehensible mercy of God. We
joyfully repent as God’s mercy floods us.
Jesus speaks three unforgettable parables in Luke 15 of the lost coin,
lost sheep and lost son. Each
parable concludes with a repentance throbbing with joy. I
think that our foreparents (or at least some of them) may have erred in thinking
that the big threat engineered repentance. The
big threat, however, doesn’t change the human heart.
To be sure it does coerce tolerable conduct, even as people hate the one
who threatens them. How many adults
are there who were emotionally bludgeoned into being models of middle-class
convention and hated their parents for it? And
how many adults, for the same reason, have grown up feeling the same way about
God? Before
we write off our foreparents we should understand that our contemporaries
(particularly our religious contemporaries) err in thinking that repentance is
genuine only if we first disparage ourselves or purge ourselves or induce an
unusual mental state. But to think
we have to undergo a technique-ridden, psycho-religious initiation is to cast
aspersion on God’s mercy and soak ourselves in anxiety: “I can’t seem to
get into the right spiritual space.” Nowhere
does Jesus prescribe self-disparagement or psycho-religious self-preparation.
He simply stands before us and assures us that his arms, the arms of the
crucified, embrace everyone without exception, without condition and without
hesitation. His mercy is simple,
profound, transparent, effectual. Repentance,
says Jesus, is coming to our senses, as the son in the far country came to his
senses when he thought of the waiting father.
Repentance, says Jesus, is to become a child again, because for a child
everything is received as gift. Repentance,
says, Jesus, is so far from anything miserable that it calls for a party, for
celebration, for dancing. III: -- I
want to conclude the sermon today with a glance into history at three of our
foreparents who did get it right, who did know what scripture means by
“repentance.” First
is Martin Luther (1483-1546.) On
Hallowe’en, 1517, Luther nailed his Ninety-Five Theses to the door of the
church in The
second person I want us to think about is John Calvin (1509-1864), another
Sixteenth Century Reformer. In his
Commentary on Deuteronomy, in the course of discussing the Ten Commandments,
Calvin argued cogently that the form in which God’s command comes to us is
invitation. On the one hand the
command to repent is just that: a command. On
the other hand, in light of God’s all-embracing mercy, the form of the command
isn’t a sergeant-major’s bark but a winsome invitation: “Why don’t you
repent? Isn’t it better to
re-orient your life than not to? Your
Father is waiting for you to RSVP the invitation.” The
third person is really a cluster of persons: Seventeenth Century Puritans.
The Puritans insisted that all God’s commands are covered promises.
All God’s commands are promises in disguise.
To be sure, God does command us to repent, return.
At the same time, by his Spirit God guarantees the fulfilment of his
command. If ever we doubt that we
can repent, can repent adequately, all we need do is look to our Lord who
submitted to John’s baptism of repentance not because he, Jesus, needed to
repent but because we need to. In
other words, if we doubt the adequacy of our own repentance we must cling afresh
to Jesus Christ in faith, for in clinging to him we are one with him who gathers
our defective repentance into his sufficient, effectual repentance and thereby
ensures that ours is adequate.
All the commands of God are covered promises. Mark tells us that Jesus came into Galilee with a very
simply message: “The Why
not? Victor
Shepherd
February 2004
|