It’s
startling to find the word “promise” hundreds of times over in
the English translations of the Hebrew bible.
It’s startling for one reason: the word “promise”
isn’t found in the Hebrew language.
In biblical Hebrew the verb that the English translators
render “promise” is simply the verb to speak or the verb to
say. In ancient
Hebrew if someone merely said he would do something his saying it
was a promise.
We are far from this attitude today.
Today we ask someone if he will do something; he says he will;
then we come back, “Do you promise?”
Plainly we are asking him to promise he will do what he has
said he will just because we can’t trust him; we can’t trust that
his simple, unadorned word is trustworthy.
We can’t count on him inasmuch as he has spoken.
Our fellow-Christians who are Quakers noted all of this as
early as the 1600s. Everyone
knows that Quakers have consistently refused to take an oath in court
to tell the truth; they will not swear to tell the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth -- for one reason: Quakers believe
that Christians tell the truth at all times and in all situations.
Why, then, would they make a special promise to tell the truth
in one situation? For 400
years Quaker Christians have said, “To promise to tell the truth in
court is to admit that we do not or may not tell the truth out of
court; it’s to admit that our word can’t be trusted day-in and
day-out. But our word can
be trusted: what we say we perform.
Our simple word is our promise.”
In ancient
Israel
someone’s word was her promise for one reason: God’s word was his
promise. What he said, he
did. Promise guaranteed
performance.
Since the characteristic of the living God is that he
speaks, we can just as readily say that the characteristic of
the living God is that he promises; and not only promises, performs.
Everywhere in the Hebrew bible God’s promise guarantees
fulfilment. If the promise
is made, performance is sure. Nothing
describes God more characteristically than the fact that he is the
promise-maker and therefore the promise-keeper.
I:
-- Then
we should pay closer attention when we read in the newer testament
(Romans 9:4-5) that the promises (of God) belong to
Israel
. Note the present tense:
to
Israel
belong (there continue to belong, there belong right now) the
promises. It isn’t
suggested that the promises used to belong to
Israel
but do no longer.
It’s important to acknowledge this truth for several reasons,
not least because of a remark that was made concerning my ministry in
Mississauga
. The remark was, “Why
doesn’t Victor shut up about the Jews?
There is no place in Christian worship for his repeated
references to the Jews. If
Victor thinks so highly of them, why doesn’t he move over to the
synagogue and join them?” I
find it odd that no place is to be given to Yiddishkeit in Christian
worship when Christian scripture insists that the promises belong to
Israel
still. According to Christian scripture (what we call the “New”
Testament)
Israel
continues to have a place in God’s economy by God’s ordination.
Could it ever be appropriate to deny this truth in a service of
worship?
My repeated insistence on
Israel
’s ongoing place in the plan and purpose of God doesn’t mean for a
minute that the Jewish people alone of all the peoples on earth have
been spared the Fall. It
doesn’t mean that they alone have pure hearts while we Gentiles are
treacherous. After all it
is a Jew, Jeremiah, who insists that the hearts of his own people are
“deceitful above all things and desperately corrupt.”(Jer. 17:9)
Jew and Gentile are alike creatures of the Fall.
It doesn’t mean that every last Jewish person is loveable or
trustworthy -- just as no one is silly enough to pretend that every
last Gentile is loveable or trustworthy.
It doesn’t mean that every political move of the modern state
of
Israel
is to be approved. The
political moves of the modern state of
Israel
must be evaluated in accord with the moves of any nation-state.
It doesn’t mean that the history of ancient
Israel
has been whitewashed. The
Hebrew prophets were tormented by a spiritual unfaithfulness in
Israel
that they described as harlotry; the same prophets were angered by a
hypocrisy that they spoke of as a stench in the nostrils of God.
But -- and it’s a huge “but” -- while God’s
next-to-last word to Israel (spoken through Hosea) is “Lo-ammi”
(“Not my people”), “Lo-ruchamah” (“Not pitied”), God’s
final word to Israel is, “How can I give you up?
And because I cannot give you up, I must call you “Ammi”
(“My people”), “Ruchamah” (“Pitied”).
Centuries ago Jesus appeared before Pilate.
Pilate didn’t want to bother with Jesus, since Pilate knew
that adjudicating Jewish squabbles was a no-win matter for him.
In a voice dripping with contempt Pilate asked Jesus, “Am I a
Jew?” -- meaning, “The whole world knows that I’m not one of
your miserable people.”
When our daughter Catherine was fourteen (fourteen, not four,
and not stupid either) she asked Maureen and me at the dinner table
one evening in genuine bewilderment, “Are we Jews?”
Maureen and I quickly told Catherine, “No.
At least not exactly, but in a sense, yes, inasmuch as all
Christians are honorary Jews; all Christians are guests in the house
of
Israel
.”
Let us never forget the words of the apostle: “Until you
Gentiles had embraced Jesus Christ in faith you were alienated from
the
commonwealth
of
Israel
.”(Eph. 2:12) Since we
have embraced Jesus Christ we now belong to the
commonwealth
of
Israel
.
What will happen if we Gentile Christians forget that the
promises belong to
Israel
? What will happen if we
forget that we are guests in the house of
Israel
?
We shall neglect
Israel
’s book, what we call the older testament (it happens to be 78% of
the bible), the first testament; and in neglecting it we shall ruin
the Christian faith. Ruin
it? Yes, utterly.
(i)
In the first place we shall forfeit the truth that the universe
is God’s creation, created out of his oceanic love, ruled by his
sovereign mercy, sustained by his incomprehensible patience and
finally accountable to him. We
shall forfeit this foundational truth inasmuch as the newer testament
doesn’t yield a doctrine of creation.
(ii)
In the second place we shall fail to understand ourselves as
human beings. It is only
in
Israel
’s book that we learn we are made uniquely in God’s image, have
been made “response-able” to him and “response-ible” for our
life with him and with other humans alike made in his image.
(iii)
In the third place we shall no longer know who God is.
We shall forget that
God is not identical with his creation or with any part of it.
(The biggest confusion at alal times is the confusion between
God and God’s creation.) To
say this is to say that God is holy, and apart from the older
testament we can’t understand what God’s holiness means.
Apart from the older testament we can’t understand that God
is person. Because God is
person, according to Israel’s book, he is heartbroken like a husband
whose wife leaves him for another man; he weeps like a wife whose
husband won’t come home; he rages at horrors in the world that
should find you and me raging too; he grieves over children who would
rather be lost than found; he snorts like a labourer or an athlete
whose exertion is at its outermost limit; he rejoices like a father
whose child is the apple of his eye; he bonds himself to his people
like a nursing mother whose breastfeeding brings as much comfort and
contentment to her as it brings nourishment to her infant.
When we have ignored -- or worse, disdained -- our place in the
commonwealth
of
Israel
what shall we have left of God? Certainly
not God as holy and God as person.
Then what? an abstract idea? a lifeless principle? a projection
from our wish-list?
(iv)
In the fourth place unless we keep before us our membership in
the commonwealth of Israel we shall invariably magnify the wickedness
of anti-Semitism, which wickedness the world may politely denounce out
of political correctness but secretly always aids and abets.
Need I say more?
“To them -- Israelites -- belong (present tense) the
promises.” I am
unashamed to take my stand with the apostle.
II:
-- In
taking my stand with the apostle Paul I thereby endorse his conviction
that “All the promises of God find their Yes in Christ.” (2 Cor.
1:20) Whatever God has
promised throughout his centuries-long struggle with
Israel
; whatever he has promised to
Israel
, or through
Israel
to the church, it is gathered up and fulfilled and crowned in Christ
Jesus our Lord. In fact
all the promises made to
Israel
, made through
Israel
, are promised afresh in Christ and performed in Christ.
“All the promises of God find their Yes in him”, says the
apostle.
Because the God who incarnates himself in Jesus of Nazareth is
the promise-making (promise-keeping) God, there are scores of promises
arising from the earthly ministry of Jesus that we could take to heart
this morning and sustain ourselves with until our struggle is over
too. There isn’t time to
probe scores of them; today we shall probe three only.
(i)
The
first promise is that we are never unaccompanied.
“I am with you always, to the close of the age”, says our
Lord.(Matt. 28:20) He has
promised that he will never forsake us.
Note: he will never forsake us.
This is the promise. The
promise isn’t that you and I shall never feel forsaken.
Christ’s people often feel forsaken.
Think of the sentence Paul writes in his second letter to the
congregation in
Corinth
. He speaks of the
affliction that savaged him and others in
Asia
. He doesn’t tell us
precisely what the affliction was.
He does tell us, however, what the effect of the affliction was
on him and his friends: “We were so utterly, unbearably crushed that
we despaired of life itself.”(2 Cor. 1:8-10)
How much worse could anyone feel?
“We were crushed. We
despaired of life itself.” Remember,
our Lord has promised never to forsake us; he hasn’t promised that
he will never allow us to feel forsaken.
It’s only fair that we let Paul finish his own sentence:
“We felt we had received the sentence of death, but that was to
make us rely not on ourselves but on God who raises the dead.
Therefore on him we have set our hope that he will deliver us
again.”
Our Lord has promised that he will never leave us
unaccompanied. Has he kept
his promise? How can
anyone know whether he has kept his promise?
Plainly there can be no proof.
It’s impossible to prove that Jesus never leaves his people
unaccompanied. But lack of
proof is no detriment. After
all, in the profoundest matters of life there never is proof.
I can’t prove to anyone that my wife loves me.
At the same time, I have never doubted that she loves me
ardently. In the
profoundest matters of life there never is proof; but there is
testimony, witness.
Then what testimony has been borne to our Lord’s
promise-keeping? We must
summon witnesses and allow them to speak.
How many witnesses will it take to convince us?
Myself, I always begin with my grandmother.
She was poorly educated (the eldest of 15 children), became a
servant-girl in
England
at age 12, and then the wife of a factory-worker in early 1900s
Canada
. (In other words, she had
only pennies.) Ten
pregnancies, six live births, four surviving children; kidney removed
in 1917; towards the end of her life she had to attend relentlessly to
a husband whose limbs were as twisted as a pretzel and who was unable
to get out of bed for the last 11 years of his life -- which husband
she managed to outlive for a year or two.
Perhaps you wish to say that her situation may not have been so
very unusual for people of her era.
Nonetheless, what was unusual was her quiet testimony
concerning the promise kept. “I
am with you always; you are never unaccompanied.”
Proof is impossible in the nature of the case.
Her testimony (to me, at least) was so authentic as to be
unrejectable. The final
stanza of her favourite hymn was fixed in her heart and on her lips:
No tempest can my courage shake,
My love from Thee no pain can take,
No fear my heart appal.
And where I cannot see I’ll trust
For then I know Thou surely must
Be still my all in all.
In the latter part of the 1800s and in the early part of the
1900s Nathanael Burwash was a giant in Canadian Methodism.
Scholar, university professor, churchman, preacher, Burwash was
instrumental in moving Victoria College from Cobourg to the University
of Toronto with all that Canada’s pre-eminent university could do
for Victoria and Victoria for it.
In addition Burwash was a major architect of the uniting
churches of 1925. In one
terrible week in 1889 he and his wife lost four children to
diphtheria. What did
Burwash do? Curse God?
Rage that God was merely a teaser and tormentor?
Conclude that there was no more substance or truth to faith
than to a child’s imaginary playmate?
Just the opposite. His
consistent testimony was that his Lord’s promise was kept.
Christ’s people are never unaccompanied.
(ii)
Never unillumined
is the second promise we shall examine this morning.
“I am the light of the world.
Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness but will have the
light of life.”(John 8:12) He
has promised never to leave us in the dark.
But sometimes we feel we are in the dark.
What’s more, we are annoyed at people who claim never
to be confused or perplexed or stymied or ignorant; we are
annoyed at people who never seem to recognize life’s complexity.
Then what does our Lord mean when he promises never to leave us
unillumined? He means that
he will always provide us with enough light to take the next step;
only the next step, to be sure, but at least the next step.
He hasn’t promised to give us so much light as to let us see
where we shall be and what we shall be about 45 years hence, but
certainly enough light for the next step so that the only issue facing
you and me is obedience. If
we lacked all light we could readily excuse our sin; but as long as we
have enough light for one step, the next step, then the issue isn’t
light; the issue is obedience. To
obey is always to find enough light for the next step again, and then
for the next step after that. Not
to obey, of course, is to find ourselves in a darkness that only grows
darker.
We must be sure to note that the promise isn’t that no one
ever walks in darkness; the promise is that whoever follows Jesus; this
person won’t walk in darkness, for Christ is light.
(iii)
Never unaccompanied, never unillumined, never neglected.
Says our Lord, “If you, then, who are evil, know how to give
good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in
heaven give good things to those who ask him.”(Matt. 7:7-11//Luke
11:9-13) Actually, there
is a preface to the promise. “Ask, and you will receive; seek, and
you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.
For nobody asks or seeks or knocks in vain.
Is your heavenly Father a torturer?
Depraved as you are you wouldn’t treat your child like that.
How much more will your Father in heaven give good things to
those who ask him.”
What are the “good things”?
“Goodies”? Trinkets
and toys? Luke’s version
of Christ’s promise helps us here: “How much more will your Father
give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him.”
The Holy Spirit is God himself in his utmost immediacy,
intimacy, intensity. He
himself is the gift; he himself in his immediacy, intimacy, intensity.
All who ask, seek, knock find themselves flooded by the Spirit.
Is the promise kept? Proof
is impossible. Testimony
alone matters, as testimony alone pertains to the profoundest aspects
of life.
With whose testimony do we begin?
Paul says, “I am rock-ribbed certain that nothing can
separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Peter says, “His divine power has given us everything needed
for life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us by
his own glory and goodness.” Julian
of Norwich (a 14th century woman), “All shall be well, and all
manner of things shall be well.”
Martin Luther, when asked where he would be if everything he
had agonized over and laboured for were overturned, replied, “I
shall be then where I am now; in the hands of God.”
When a prison guard taunted Nicholas Ridley, the most brilliant
of the English Reformers, on the eve of Ridley’s execution, “Do
know what’s going to happen to you tomorrow, Mr. Ridley?”, Ridley
had replied, “Yes, I know what’s going to happen to me tomorrow;
tomorrow I marry. Blessed
are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.”
The prophet Jeremiah has testified, “God’s faithfulness is
great; his steadfast love never ceases; his mercies never come to an
end.”
There is no point in piling up testimonies ad infinitum.
Once we have heard them, all that remains for us is to take it
all to heart. Which is to
say, all that remains for us is to entrust ourselves to him who is
Israel
’s greater son. Because
he is a son of
Israel
and speaks Hebrew, he doesn’t have to say “I promise” in order
to promise. All he needs
do is speak. His word is
his promise, his promise kept.
For all the promises of God find their Yes in Christ Jesus our
Lord.
Victor
Shepherd
June 2007