All in an Easter Evening
Judges
6:19
-24
John 20:19-23
Part One
John tells us that on Easter Sunday evening the disciples were
huddled together in a room, having locked the door “for fear of the
Jews”. Apparently the
disciples feared THE JEWS. Feared
all of them? Every last
Jew in
Palestine
? Every last Jew in the
world? It’s preposterous
to think that every last Jew had ganged up on Jesus a few days
earlier. It was the
leaders of Jewish institutions,
leaders of the
Jerusalem
temple, who had conspired against him and killed him.
It was religious officials who had felt themselves threatened
and who had decided to end the threat.
In the written gospels we are told that the common people –
who were Jews themselves – had heard Jesus gladly throughout his
earthly ministry. And of
course the disciples in the room on Easter evening were all Jews too.
We shouldn’t be surprised that the religious leaders in
Palestine
“cozied up” to the political authorities and became little more
than the religious legitimation of political power and social
ascendancy and religious self-interest.
It happened then. It
happens now. It’s always
happened.
When John Strachan was Anglican bishop of
Toronto
in the 1800s he insisted that only the sons and daughters of the
Anglican elite had the right to the best education.
Bishop John Strachan also provided the religious buttress for
the “Family Compact”, that handful of well-to-do people of
superior social standing and extraordinary wealth who controlled everything
in the
province
of
Ontario
.
We shouldn’t be surprised that religious officials in
Palestine
struck a “deal” with political officials on the eve of our Lord’s
death. On the eve of World
War II the pope signed the infamous “Concordat” with Hitler: as
long as Hitler left the Roman Catholic Church unmolested, the pope
would remain silent concerning Hitler.
Religious officials have always lined up with the echelons of
power and money and social ascendancy.
Therefore it’s no surprise that Jewish officials acted as they
did concerning Jesus.
But it’s grossly unfair -- and worse than unfair, murderous, as
history has shown -- to think that every last Jew was (and is) a
“Christ-killer”. And yet
this is the slander that has been visited on the Jewish people.
The most notorious antisemites have regularly quoted the New
Testament, quoted especially the passage we are examining today, “for
fear of THE JEWS”. The
conclusion antisemites have drawn is chilling: Jews (all of them,
without exception) hated Jesus. Having
killed Jesus Christ, Jews must think as little of Christ’s followers
as they thought of the master himself.
Therefore THE JEWS are always to be suspected.
Therefore any severity visited upon THE JEWS is deserved, even
necessary if we Christians are going to protect ourselves against the
subtle, sneaky evil of THE JEWS. For
this reason the most murderous antisemitism in history has been churchly
antisemitism.
Do I exaggerate? Let’s
look more closely at the Middle Ages.
Jewish people were tormented relentlessly throughout the Middle
Ages. In the modern era
Jewish people have regarded the
USA
as the next thing to the Promised Land for one reason: the
USA
has never known a mediaeval period, which period, for the Jewish people,
was one, long night.
Jews could be set upon and beaten at any time of the year
throughout the Middle Ages. They
were always set upon with
renewed ferocity during Lent, and especially during the week preceding
Easter. Since Holy Week reached a climax on Easter Sunday, Easter -- the
church’s festival of Christ’s
resurrection -- became the occasion of climactic savagery inflicted upon
the defenceless. THE JEWS
had killed Christ, hadn’t they? And
Christ in turn had overturned their victimization, hadn’t he?
Then it was time for the victimizers to be victimized themselves,
wasn’t it?
I am not exaggerating. Bernard
of Clairvaux, whose hymns we love to sing (“Jesus, thou joy of loving
hearts...”, for instance); Bernard of Clairvaux wrote vitriolic
slander about the Jewish people. John
Chrysostom of the Eastern Church (“Chrysostom” means
“golden-mouthed”, and the man was given this name inasmuch as he was
the finest preacher of his era -- the fourth century -- and one of its
gentlest spirits); John Chrysostom said that Jews were no better than
pigs and goats (the goat being the mediaeval symbol of rampant lust);
Jewish people deserved whatever murderous treatment was meted out to
them. Martin Luther said
Jews should be hounded out of the country and their synagogues torched.
On and on it went without letup.
When I purchase milk and bread at the corner variety store, I
don’t shout at the Greek storekeeper, “You killed Socrates.”
And when I speak to someone of Italian descent I don’t shout,
“You tortured Galileo.” Yet
large areas of the church think it permissible and
reasonable to say of Jews in any era, “You killed Christ.”
I am particularly sensitive about this issue for two reasons.
One, I am an expert in the centuries-long history of churchly
antisemitism; two, I am aware that Jewish people maintain the New
Testament itself to be inherently antisemitic.
I can’t do anything about the history.
But I will maintain that I don’t believe the New Testament to
be inherently antisemitic. I
will admit, however, that there are many passages in it which have been
distorted inasmuch as Christians haven’t been careful enough in
reading the text.
“The disciples were huddled together for fear of THE JEWS.”
Not for fear of the Jews who had heard Jesus gladly.
But certainly for fear of a handful of religious officials.
The same handful of religious officials has been party to
power-brokering in every era. Let’s
be sure we understand this and then expunge from our misreading of the
gospel every last vestige of antisemitism, which nastiness isn’t
in the gospel in any case but may yet lurk in our hearts.
Part Two
I:
-- It
is while the disciples huddle in fear, afraid of the abuse and torment
and untimely death that they have seen Jesus himself suffer; it is while
they are immobilized by their fear that the one who has conquered what
they still fear steals upon them. They
can’t explain how the risen Lord has penetrated their hideout.
Our Lord always reveals himself when and where he wills, in a
manner beyond our comprehending. To
this day we can’t explain how the risen one looms before any of us; not being
able to explain it, however, doesn’t prevent us from knowing it and
glorying in it. We can’t comprehend it (in the sense of mastering the logic of it), but we
can certainly apprehend it as
the risen one apprehends us, seizes us, and we seize him in turn.
As our Lord apprehended the fearful disciples he said, “Peace
be with you.” It was the
everyday Hebrew greeting. It
had the same force as our present-day “Good morning.”
Having greeted the disciples Jesus showed them his hands and
side. He did this to
establish his identity. The
risen one was the crucified one, and the crucified one was the risen
one. The risen one hadn’t
replaced the crucified one. The
risen one wasn’t a ghostly substitute for the crucified one.
The one whom they were mourning was now among them alive.
Whereupon, John tells us, “...the disciples were glad when they
saw the Lord.”
Of course they rejoiced. To
see him was to know that they weren’t
bereft of him. To see him
was to know that he hadn’t perished finally.
To see him was to know that he hadn’t
abandoned them. To see him
was to know that since death hadn’t
been able to deprive them of him, nothing
would ever deprive them of him. As
soon as Jesus identified himself to them they rejoiced, for the one in
whose company they had ventured for three years they now knew they
hadn’t lost.
Whereupon the risen one spoke a second time to them, “Peace be
with you.” Why the second
time? A minute ago I said
that you and I regularly greet each other with “Good morning.”
Do you know the origin of “Good morning?”
“Good morning” originally meant “God’s
morning.” When people
greeted each other with “God’s
morning to you” they were confirming one another in a new day, a new
creation, fresh from God’s
hand and surrounded by God’s
providence and suffused with God’s
promises. “God’s morning
to you” originally wasn’t
the equivalent of “Hi there.” Originally
it was an affirmation of the truth and triumph of God in the face of
everything in the day ahead that would appear to contradict God’s
truth and triumph.
When the risen one said “Peace be with you” the second
time he wasn’t saying, “Hi there, fellows.”
He was saying “shalom”, with all that “shalom” meant for
the godly Israelite.
What did it mean? “Shalom”
means “peace”; but not peace in the minimalist sense of the absence
of war; and not peace merely in the privatized sense of inner
contentment. Shalom, peace,
is salvation.
Centuries before Jesus, Gideon built an altar to remind his
people of their deliverance at God’s
hand. Gideon named the
altar, “The Lord is peace”. Two
hundred years later the psalmist wrote (Psalm 27), “The Lord is...my
salvation.” What’s the
difference between the two statements?
There is no difference. “Peace”
(shalom) and “salvation”
are synonyms in Hebrew.
At its narrowest salvation was the individual’s
deliverance from God’s
judgement and her re-creation at God’s hand; at its widest salvation
was the restoration of the entire cosmos to what it was before evil
invaded it and sin defaced it. Plainly,
then, salvation, peace, is the same as the
kingdom
of
God
. All three terms mean the
same.
When the risen one loomed before his befuddled disciples with
“Peace be with you” he was saying, “Fellows, my crucifixion isn’t
the negation of the kingdom as you have thought for the last few days;
my crucifixion is the foundation-stone of the kingdom.
Because of it, because of what it altered in the commerce between
earth and heaven, the kingdom can come fully.
A new day has dawned. God’s
morning is now operative. Raised
from the dead, I am the pledge and guarantee and cornerstone of that new
creation, the reality in which you stand now.”
All of this is gathered up in our Lord’s
second utterance of “Peace
be with you”. The
disciples (who are the first Christian congregation) rejoice to know
that shalom, salvation, is present in the master who himself is present.
II:
-- Next
our Lord does three things, all three of which arise from the truth and
reality of that kingdom which he, the king, guarantees.
(i)
First the risen Jesus commissions
the disciples: “As the Father has sent me, even so I send you.”
Just because peace, God’s salvation, is now the operative
reality, the disciples can no longer huddle self-protectively.
They have to “body forth” this truth, just as their Lord did
before them, and must “body forth” this truth for the same reason
that their Lord did: they, like him, have been sent.
(ii)
Secondly, our Lord equips
them for the mission on which they have been sent.
“Receive the Holy Spirit.”
The Holy Spirit is the presence and power of God equipping men
and women for the work to which God has appointed them.
Because the disciples are now Spirit-suffused they don’t have
to generate the power or the effectiveness or the results of their
mission. Because
they are now Spirit-suffused they don’t have to worry about its
outcome. All they have to
concern themselves with is their own obedience.
Having been sent, they must go; having been commissioned, they
must do.
(iii)
Thirdly, our Lord charges
them most solemnly: “If you forgive the sins of any, they are
forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”
“Just a minute”, someone objects, “only God can forgive
sin, since sin is a violation of God by definition.
Didn’t the psalmist write, “Against thee, thee only, have I
sinned”?
It’s all true. Since
God is uniquely victimized in our sin only God can forgive us our sin.
Then what does Jesus mean when he charges the disciples, “Those
whose sin you forgive is
forgiven, and those whose sin you
retain is retained”? He
means that where and when the disciples obediently declare in word and
deed the gospel of the crucified and risen saviour, the Spirit empowers
their proclamation; and wherever the Spirit empowers
gospel-proclamation, hearers are confronted with the risen one himself;
and whenever they are confronted with Jesus Christ they can cast
themselves on him and know peace, salvation, life in the kingdom of God.
On the other hand, if the disciples fail to announce the gospel,
then Jesus Christ isn’t known, isn’t clung to, isn’t cherished as
saviour -- all of which means that men and women are left in their
sinnership. And since the
disciples are the first Christian congregation, whatever is said of them
is said of all congregations. If
through the gospel-witness of the congregation of Schomberg Presbyterian
Church people find themselves alive unto God because forgiven, they are
forgiven and alive indeed; and if through the congregation’s
non-witness people are spiritually inert, they remain inert.
“Surely not”, someone objects again.
“Surely there isn’t
this much depending on the disciples’ honouring their commission and
Spirit-empowerment and charge. Surely
the most that the text can mean is that through the ministry of the
congregation people are brought to an awareness
of God’s forgiveness; and if the congregation falls down in its
proclamation then people aren’t brought to any such awareness.”
But this isn’t what the text says, and this isn’t what our
Lord means. He means exactly
what he says: where and when the congregation fulfils the mandate it
received on Easter morning from the hand of the crucified one himself;
where and when the congregation fulfils its mandate people are admitted
to the salvation God has wrought for them; and where the congregation
fumbles its mandate, people are not.
In other words, the congregation has an indispensable role in
God’s economy. And because
we have an indispensable role in the economy of salvation, we have an
unavoidable responsibility.
Our foreparents in faith knew this.
Our contemporaries frequently do not.
For this reason we continue to hear that the church “has had
its day”. Tell me, how can
the church’s “day” have passed as long as people sin and God is
the just judge and the day of repentance hasn’t been foreclosed?
I was ordained in 1970. On
the morning of the evening’s
ordination service a group of ministers sitting in a coffee shop invited
me to join them, since I was only hours from being admitted to their
club. These clergymen joked
blasphemously with each other as to who believed the least concerning
the substance of the historic Christian faith.
My own pastor, assuming an all-knowing air, opined that the
church’s day was indeed over. The
reason the church was obsolete? The
rise of the social sciences and the welfare state.
The sociologist, the psychotherapist, the social worker, the
parole officer, even the welfare clerk had together rendered the church
obsolete. A few months ago a
dental specialist who had my mouth wedged open for an hour and half
(thus rendering me incapable of replying) told me repeatedly that he
used to “support” the church (whatever that means) but did no longer
because society had matured beyond the church.
Any society has matured beyond the gospel?
It’s preposterous to say that spiritually destitute people have
matured beyond their need of the mercy of Jesus Christ; it’s sheer
ignorance (and a mark of spiritual obtuseness) to think therefore that
the congregation is without indispensable role and unavoidable
responsibility.
Let me say it again. Where
and when the church falters in its declaration of the gospel, in word
and deed, then Jesus Christ isn’t
known. Where he isn’t known he can’t be
apprehended. Where he
isn’t apprehended the salvation which he is is slighted, he himself
isn’t obeyed, and false gods continue to be pursued.
III:
-- What
does all of this add up to for us today?
(i)
We must be sure we understand that while the peace, shalom,
salvation, which our risen Lord is is ultimately cosmic in scope, it
becomes operative in individuals individually.
Therefore we must each surrender ourselves to our Lord or
consecrate ourselves to him anew. Anything
else is but to trifle with him.
(ii)
We must ever own the congregation’s vocation concerning the
gospel: the congregation has an indispensable role in God’s economy,
and because it has an indispensable role it also has an unavoidable
responsibility. The
congregation’s mission is charged with eternal significance for those
who are the beneficiaries of the congregation’s work and witness.
(iii)
We must put behind us forever all foolish, frivolous and
faithless talk as to whether or not the church is now obsolete or
currently irrelevant or senescently insignificant.
We must put all such faithless talk behind us, since men and
women are sinners, since God is both undeflectable judge and merciful
saviour, since God’s patience isn’t exhausted and the day of
repentance isn’t foreclosed. Nothing
has greater relevance, significance and efficacy than the church on
account of the gospel entrusted to it.
(iv)
We must search our own hearts.
What are we about, ultimately?
What thrills us profoundly? What
saddens us? disgusts us? What
forms and informs our commitments, our moods, our aspirations?
What calls forth our sacrifice?
What are we about finally?
(v)
Lastly, we must assess all that we do in church life, from Board
of Managers to Sunday School to Session.
Does it all honour God by magnifying that Son whom he gave up to
death and raised for us? Does
it all honour God by magnifying that Son who has commissioned and
equipped and charged this congregation as surely as he did the
disciples, the first congregation?
When
the fearful disciples discerned the risen Lord in their midst, their
fear evaporated and their hearts rejoiced.
For myself, and for you as well, I want always to discern the
selfsame Lord, know the same release, and manifest the same joy.
Victor
Shepherd
March 2008