Unless
you are born anew, you cannot see the kingdom of God, Jesus insists to
Nicodemus (John 3:3). If we can’t even see
the kingdom apart from new birth, how much less are we able to enter
it? It’s no wonder that John Calvin spoke of regeneration as “the
most important thing in the kingdom of God.”
Nicodemus,
however, is puzzled. For how can an adult reappear in his mother’s
uterus? He has misinterpreted the Greek word anothen.
It can mean “again” in the sense of “one more time, a
chronological repetition”; or “from above (that is, at the hand of
God)”; or “remade without blemish or imperfection.” Nicodemus
fastens on the first meaning only; Jesus has in mind the latter two
only.
Our
Lord knows that a fresh start in life is pointless if the new beginning
merely reproduces the “old” man or woman corrupted by the same sin.
He maintains, rather, that everyone needs a qualitatively new existence,
and this can come only “from above,” as a gift of God.
While
the word anothen occurs only
once in Scripture, the truth it embodies is found everywhere. Paul
speaks repeatedly of “new creation” and “new man/woman” and
“newness of life.” Peter speaks of Christians as “newborn
babes.” Jesus warns against causing “little ones” to stumble,
spiritually newborn people of any chronological age.
Centuries
earlier the prophet Ezekiel heard God promise a new heart of flesh,
unlike the old heart of stone. Whereas the old was inert and
insensitive, the “new heart and new spirit” (Ezekiel 18:31) would
throb, alive unto God.
Plainly
the alternative to new birth is old death, eternal death. In Christ’s
well-known parable, that of the two son, the father’s joy overflows at
his estranged son’s reconciliation and return from the far country.
Why? Just because this son
of mine “was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.”
“Dead.”
“Lost.” This is the spiritual predicament of fallen men and women.
It is grim. Lost to whom? Lost eternally before God. We must never
reduce the gospel to a form of existentialist philosophy wherein
salvation is merely rescue from being lost to oneself (people aren’t
sure who they are) or from being lost concerning life’s purpose (they
find life meaningless).
“Lost,
dead” refers rather to our predicament before God. To be “dead in
trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1) is to be lost ultimately.
At
the same time, since the creature has no rights or power over the
Creator, we should never think that spiritual death is something we have
brought upon ourselves. Death is God’s judgment upon our rebellious
disobedience and our insolent ingratitude. Adam and Eve didn’t flee
the garden of Eden: God’s judicial act drove them out. It expelled them and barred any attempt they might
make to regain it.
Since
God’s judgment has driven them away, only God’s judgment rescinded
can re-admit them and reconcile them to Him. Apart from a divine act
of incomprehensible mercy, the fate of humankind—“dead, lost”—is
sealed. This is the reason the cross leaves all believers breathless: in
the cross God acted mercifully to reconcile and regenerate those whose
predicament is otherwise hopeless.
The
sacrifice of God’s Son fulfils the sacrifices Israel offered for
centuries. The purpose of Israel’s sacrifices was to allow sin-defiled
people to approach the holy God without thereby being annihilated, as
well as to render them holy in turn. Blood gathered from sacrificial
victims and poured upon the altar—even poured upon worshipers—would
issue in sins forgiven and hearts renewed, as Ezekiel promised.
The
Day of Atonement saw two goats offered up as part of the divinely
ordained prefiguration of the cross (Leviticus 16:8-15). One goat was
sacrificed in the sanctuary and its blood sprinkled on the mercy-seat,
where the Holy and the defiled meet. The second was driven into the
wilderness, having had Israel’s sin confessed over it and laid upon
it. The first sacrifice averted God’s wrath; the second bore away
Israel’s sin.
Both
sacrifices are gathered up in the cross. The New Testament speaks of the
first as “propitiation” and the second as “expiation.”
Propitiation averts God’s anger (always at God’s initiative), thus
making it possible for the sinner to hear and heed the invitation to
“come home.” Expiation makes it possible for the sinner to come home
guilt-free.
Apostolic
testimony characteristically sounds both truths. Christ’s blood has
“saved [us] from the wrath of God” (Romans 5:9). At the same time
the crucified one “bore our sins in his body on the tree” (1 Peter
2:24). The singular act of the cross both satisfies the Father’s
judgment and bleaches our stain.
Still,
all that the Saviour has accomplished for us and now longs to effect in
us by the power of the Spirit comes to be ours only as we own Him in
faith. Spirit-wrought faith is the bond whereby we are united to Him. We
are made beneficiaries of His
sacrifice and henceforth identified as new creatures.
Why
is it all to be “received by faith apart from works”? The answer is
simple: our “works” are our attempts at self-acquittal and
self-renewal. Our works indicate that we foolishly prefer to trust our
self-righteousness (no righteousness at all) instead of abandoning
ourselves to the righteousness God has fashioned for us in the cross.
Such attempts amount to monumental ingratitude and blind folly.
Since
such attempts are themselves sin-riddled, they are patently ridiculous.
Any putting forward of our own “works” is undeniably our effort at
contributing to our salvation, wherein we would claim some credit.
Faith, on the other hand, is our commitment to the Saviour who is
Himself our salvation.
Contribution
(of works) and commitment (of faith) are mutually exclusive and jointly
exhaustive. Either we cling to whatever it is we want to thrust before
God as a bargaining chip or we open our hand, drop what we had thought
to impress Him, and seize in faith the provision He has fashioned for
us. There is no other possibility.
For
this reason the hymn writer had it right when he wrote, “Nothing
in my hand I bring; simply to thy cross I cling.”
Victor
Shepherd of Toronto is professor of systematic and historical theology
at Tyndale University College and Seminary, and a minister of the
Presbyterian Church in Canada.