Humanism and Luther
In each of the major countries of the north there were
three generations of humanists.
[1] “pioneers” -- they acquired classical learning and
absorbed a classical mindset.
[2] “consolidators” -- they integrated and developed the rich
materials the pioneers unearthed,
creating the
high point
of humanist learning.
[3] “doers” -- they were a younger generation who cherished
humanism not so much for its
intellectual
excellence as for its providing tools for social change.
Between 1510 and 1520 many of these third generation
humanists gathered around L., eager to do something about abuses in
church and society. These
people were the “runners” who disseminated L’s Ninety-Five Theses
throughout
Germany
.
Luther profited from a humanist environment but was not
especially humanist trained (despite having attended
Erfurt
U.
) and was never interested in humanism as such.
Yet there were discernible affinities between Luther and the
humanists.
[1] rejection of scholasticism:
H: scholastic theology is unnecessarily complex, obscure,
unintelligible; a more elegant
theological
formulation is needed.
L: scholastic theology is
intelligible -- and therefore should be recognized readily as anti-
gospel.
[2] desire to return to patristics:
H: Patristics is a simple, understandable statement of Christian
faith, devoid of fruitless
speculation
and incomprehensible scholastic Latin.
L: Patristics is closer to the NT era than is the mediaeval
period, less distorted, less
warped
by a non-biblical logic.
Note:
since the humanists esteemed antiquity, no one father was to be elevated
(exception: Erasmus
and Jerome.) For the
Wittenberg
theologians, Augustine was pre-eminent.
[3] desire to return to scripture:
H: sola scriptura =
“not without scripture”
L: sola scriptura =
“scripture as unnormed norm” (singularly used by the Spirit
to acquaint us with the living Lord Jesus Christ.)
[4] interest in rhetoric:
H: an interest in eloquence as a cultural excellence.
L: an interest in preaching the
gospel.
After 1520 the Reformation stood out in starker
contrast with humanism. Humanists
finally realized that their purposes and the Reformation’s were not
the same.
But note: non-humanistically trained pastors were the
foot soldiers of the Reformation, dutiful church functionaries.
Yet they never provided intellectual or organizational leadership
for the Reformation. Subsequently
they became the most rigidly scholastic Protestants, re-introducing an
utterly scholastic mindset only with a Protestant vocabulary.
Humanist education remains crucial in the formation of Christians and
clergy.
V.
Shepherd