|
|
|
CUR DEUS HOMO?
Outline Of Argument I:
The attempt at demonstrating the necessity of the Incarnation II:
Unbelievers' objections concerning the condescension of God
but: (i) the humility and humiliation of God
magnify God's grace
(ii)
it is appropriate for an act of
disobedience to be put right by an act of supreme obedience III:
The inappropriateness of God's rescuing humankind through deputing human
or angel instead of humbling himself IV:
The three-fold imprisonment from which humankind needs to be redeemed:
(i) the enslavement of sin
(ii) the just anger of God
(iii) the power of the devil over sinners V:
The question of the devil's rights over humankind VI:
The humility of God and the impassibility of God VII:
The apparent injustice and unreasonableness of God's
delivering up the Just Son VIII:
Sin and satisfaction IX:
The (im)possibility of redressing the disorder with the assistance of
angels X:
Satisfaction as both the making good of a failure and the assuaging of
affront or insult XI:
God's resolve to fulfil his purposes for us is not a constraint upon God
but rather a self-imposed necessity XII:
The role of recompense in God's salvation XIII:
The mode of the Incarnation
|