|
|
|
The Consequences of Undervaluing
the Older Testament 1] Jesus becomes a wax figure whom we can mould as we wish. Invariably we end up fashioning him after our image. Consider the assorted "Jesus's" that have appeared in the 20th century: the Idealist philosopher, the businessman, the existentialist, the liberal humanitarian, the social conservative, the supporter of Nazi ideology. It is most significant that the only physical description
the apostles give us of Jesus is that he was circumcized.
I.e., it matters not to our faith what he looked like, but it matters
supremely that he is a son of 2] The gospel
becomes ideation, an abstract amateurish philosophy, rather than the power of
God unto salvation. ( 3] We become antisemites. The history of the church's interface with the synagogue is the sorriest chapter in the church's entire history. 4] We undervalue the people of God and fail to understand the church as the people of God. In the wake of this failure the church is understood principally in terms of the clergy or in terms of an institution. 5] We undervalue history as the theatre of God's revelation and as the theatre of our discipleship. 6] We undervalue the Fall. The story of the Fall occurs only in the OT. It is a presupposition of everything that follows it in scripture. Insofar as we neglect it we adopt a roseate view of human nature, ourselves, and the world in which the Christian mission unfolds. 7] We
substitute the category of religious evolution for the biblical category of
God's promise and its subsequent fulfillment.
As a result we adopt In the light of the above-mentioned error we undervalue the
need for faithfulness, constancy and consistency in our own discipleship and
instead assume that developments in western civilization are co-terminous with
the 8] We fail to grasp the central scriptural motif of holiness, both God's and ours.
|